Senior and engineering
$75 to $120/ hour
Account strategy and tiering, signal pipelines, entity resolution and CRM work, measurement design, and the joint operating model with sales.
Account based marketing
ABM agency, for accounts sales has agreed to work
Account based marketing decides which companies matter first and works backwards to the people inside them. Most programmes sold as ABM are renamed outbound, so this page publishes the account tiering, the signals worth acting on and the measurement model, so you can judge any agency including us.
What does an ABM agency do?
An ABM agency helps you choose a defensible list of target accounts, find the real buying committee inside each, build material that speaks to a specific situation rather than a persona, and run the programme jointly with sales. The measurement, by account rather than by lead, is usually the hardest part.
Account based marketing inverts the normal order. Instead of generating leads and finding out which companies they came from, you decide which companies matter and work backwards to the people inside them. That is the whole idea, and everything difficult about it follows from the fact that it only works if sales agrees.
We should be direct about something, since you may have arrived here from a search for the top or best ABM agencies. We are not going to publish a ranked list of our competitors, because a vendor ranking its own category is not useful to you. What this page does instead is give you the material to judge any agency, including us: how to tell a real programme from renamed outbound, how to tier accounts, which signals are worth acting on, and what to measure.
What is account based marketing not?
Account based marketing is not outbound with company names attached, not advertising retargeted at a domain list, not a software purchase, and not something marketing can run alone. Most programmes sold as ABM are one of those four, which is why the category has a reputation problem.
Outbound with account names in it
Sending the same sequence to 500 contacts at 200 companies is outbound. Calling it ABM because you grouped the contacts by employer does not change what it is or how it performs.
Advertising retargeted at a company list
Running display against a list of domains is one tactic inside ABM, not the programme. On its own it mostly buys impressions from people who were not going to buy and cannot be traced to anything.
A tool purchase
Intent data and ABM platforms are useful once a programme exists to feed them. Bought first, they produce a dashboard of signals nobody is resourced to act on, which is the single most common failure in this category.
Marketing operating alone
If sales is not committed to working the named accounts on an agreed cadence, the programme generates engagement that nobody follows up. ABM is a joint operating model before it is a marketing method.
The third one deserves emphasis because it is expensive. Buying an intent or ABM platform before the programme exists produces a stream of signals nobody has the time to act on, and the common outcome is an annual contract, a dashboard somebody opens occasionally, and no change in pipeline. Tools amplify a working motion. They do not create one.
The fourth is the one that decides success. If a seller will not commit to working a named list on an agreed cadence, the programme produces engagement that goes nowhere. Get that commitment in writing before anything is built, including from us.
How should target accounts be tiered?
Three tiers by depth of investment: one to one for 10 to 30 accounts where a single win changes the year, one to few for 30 to 150 accounts clustered by a shared situation, and one to many for 150 to 1,000 handled programmatically. Most companies should start at tier two.
| Tier | Accounts | What it involves | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1, one to one | 10 to 30 accounts | Genuinely bespoke. Research per account, named stakeholders mapped, custom material, an agreed plan per account between marketing and a specific seller. | Only justified where one win materially changes the year |
| Tier 2, one to few | 30 to 150 accounts | Clustered by a shared situation rather than by firmographics. Same problem, same trigger, so the material can be shared across the cluster with light tailoring. | Where most programmes should start |
| Tier 3, one to many | 150 to 1,000 accounts | Programmatic. Segment level messaging, advertising against the list, content built for the segment. Efficient and shallow. | Useful for coverage and for finding which accounts to promote upward |
The reason to start at tier two is that it is the only tier that teaches you something affordably. One to one is expensive enough that a failed experiment costs a quarter, and one to many is shallow enough that you cannot tell whether the targeting or the message was wrong. The middle tier produces a readable result on a sensible budget.
One thing to get right about clustering: group accounts by a shared situation, not by shared firmographics. Two hundred manufacturers of similar size have nothing in common worth writing to. Forty companies that all just opened a second site have a specific problem you can address in one piece of material.
Which buying signals are worth acting on?
Funding rounds, relevant leadership hires, hiring patterns in the function you serve, public commitments with a deadline, and observable technology changes. Intent data is the weakest of the set and should prioritise a list you already believe in rather than build one.
A funding round or an acquisition
Budget and a mandate to change something, usually with a window of a few months. One of the few signals that reliably precedes buying.
A relevant leadership hire
A first head of security, a new VP of operations, a new RevOps lead. New leaders change tooling early because they are expected to show a plan.
Hiring for roles your product serves
A company posting five jobs for a function is scaling it, and scaling a function is when its tooling breaks. Visible, specific and cheap to track.
A public commitment with a deadline
A compliance date, an expansion into a new market, a product launch. Something with a date attached creates urgency you did not have to manufacture.
Technology changes you can observe
Adopting or dropping a system adjacent to yours. Strong when the connection to your product is genuine, and noise when it is inferred loosely.
Intent data
Treat as the weakest of the six. Useful to prioritise a list you already believe in, misleading as the reason to build one.
The test for any signal is whether it answers why now in a sentence a stranger would accept. A company that just hired its first security leader has a reason to be reading about security tooling this month. A company that matched your firmographic filter does not, and sending to both with the same urgency is how a list gets burned.
Signals are also where ABM becomes engineering work rather than marketing work. Collecting them reliably, resolving them to the right account record and surfacing them where a seller will see them is a data pipeline. We build that side, and the approach is on our data enrichment page.
How do you build the target account list?
Start from closed won and closed lost deals rather than from a filter. Find what the accounts you win have in common beyond size and industry, write explicit exclusion criteria, then have sellers argue with the list before anyone spends money against it.
The list is the programme. Everything downstream inherits its quality, and a list built from a filtered export will produce a campaign that performs like outbound because that is what it is.
Start with what you have won. Pull the last twenty or thirty closed won deals and look for what they share. Rarely company size. Frequently a situation: they had just expanded, they had a specific system in place, they had a role that did not exist two years earlier. That shared situation is your actual ideal customer profile and it is usually narrower than the one in the deck.
Then look at what you lost, and why. Losses for reasons you cannot fix are the clearest exclusion criteria available. If you consistently lose to a procurement requirement you do not meet, companies with that requirement do not belong on the list regardless of how well they match otherwise.
Write the exclusions down. A list defined only by what qualifies will grow until it means nothing. Explicit exclusion criteria are what keep it a target list rather than a database.
Let sales argue with it. Give sellers the list and ask which accounts they would not work and why. The accounts they reject are either wrong, or right and poorly explained, and both outcomes are useful before you spend anything.
Size it to what can actually be worked. A list of 800 accounts with two sellers is a wish. Work backwards from how many accounts a seller can genuinely cover at the cadence you intend, and let that set the number.
How do you fix poor account coverage?
Map the roles that matter for your deal, audit what share of target accounts you hold contacts for in each role, then fill the gaps deliberately. Most programmes discover they have one contact per account, usually the wrong one, and no plan for the rest of the committee.
Coverage is the measure that most often explains a failed programme, and it is both cheap to check and cheap to fix compared with everything else.
Define the roles, not the titles. Who feels the problem, who evaluates, who signs, who can block. In most B2B deals that is three to five people, and titles for those roles vary enough between companies that matching on title alone will miss them.
Audit honestly. For each target account, which of those roles do you have a contactable person for. The answer is usually worse than expected, and the gap is concentrated in the roles that sign and block rather than the ones that evaluate.
Fill the gaps without buying a database. Company level information is largely free and public, and people level data is where the per record costs appear. We go through what is worth paying for and what is not on the data enrichment page.
Keep it resolved to one account record. Coverage cannot be measured if a single company occupies four records. This is the point where ABM programmes quietly become CRM projects, and it is better to accept that early than to discover it in month four.
One number worth holding onto: single person engagement at a target account is interest, not a buying committee. The programmes that work are the ones that can show engagement from more than one role inside the same account, which is impossible to even observe without coverage.
What material does an ABM programme need?
Less than vendors suggest, and more specific. A cluster level page that names the shared situation, something that answers why now, proof the buying committee can forward internally, and a business case a finance stakeholder can defend without you in the room.
The fourth item is the one almost nobody builds, and it is the one that decides enterprise deals.
A page for the cluster, not the persona. Written to the shared situation: companies that just opened a second site, companies that just hired a first compliance lead. Specific enough that a reader recognises themselves and generic enough to serve the thirty accounts in that cluster.
Something that answers why now. The signal you acted on, reflected back. Without it, even a well targeted message is asking the reader to supply their own urgency, which they will not.
Proof that survives forwarding. Whatever you send reaches people you never contacted. It has to make sense without the conversation that preceded it, which rules out most material designed for a meeting.
A defensible business case. The person who wants your product is rarely the person who signs. The economic buyer wants a number they can defend in a meeting your champion will not attend. Giving your champion that case, with the arithmetic shown and the assumptions stated, is a genuine competitive advantage because so few vendors do it.
What you usually do not need at the start: a content library, a new website section, or a platform. Build the four above for one cluster, run it, and extend only what worked.
How do marketing and sales run ABM together?
With a named seller per account, a written cadence, a shared account plan for tier one, and a short weekly review of engaged accounts. Without those four, marketing generates engagement and nobody acts on it, which is the usual way these programmes die quietly.
The operating model matters more than any campaign decision, so agree it before building anything.
A named seller per account. Not a team, a person. Shared ownership of a target account means nobody is accountable for whether it was worked.
A written cadence. What happens when an account engages, within what period, and by whom. If a signal fires and nothing happens for a week, the programme is paying for information it discards.
An account plan for tier one only. Stakeholders, current situation, what we think they need, who owns each relationship. Worth the effort for ten to thirty accounts and a waste of time for three hundred.
A weekly review of engaged accounts. Short, and about accounts rather than metrics. Which accounts showed movement, what happened next, what is blocked.
The honest test of whether you have an ABM programme or an ABM campaign: ask a seller to name three target accounts and what they did about them this week. If the answer is vague, the programme exists in marketing only, and no agency can fix that from outside.
What do the first ninety days look like?
Definition and repair before spend. List and exclusion criteria in the first weeks, coverage audit and gap filling next, one cluster programme built and launched by the end, with coverage and engaged accounts as the only honest numbers to report at the ninety day mark.
Weeks one to three. Closed won and closed lost analysis, the shared situation that defines the list, explicit exclusions, and a session with sellers to argue with it. Output is a list with reasoning attached, sized to what can be worked.
Weeks three to six. Coverage audit against the roles that matter, account record resolution where the CRM cannot distinguish accounts, and gap filling. This is the least visible part of the engagement and usually the most valuable.
Weeks six to ten. Signal pipeline for the few signals worth acting on, the cluster material, and the operating model agreed in writing with sales.
Weeks ten to thirteen. Launch against one or two clusters. Report coverage and engaged accounts, not pipeline, because pipeline at ninety days is not credible in most B2B cycles and promising it is how agencies end up counting the wrong thing.
If the coverage audit in the second phase finds that fewer than half your accounts have the right people mapped, we will recommend pausing the campaign work and finishing the data first. It is a less exciting recommendation and it is the one that makes the rest possible.
How is ABM measured?
By account, not by lead. Account coverage and engaged accounts early, meetings and pipeline from the target list in the middle, and win rate and deal size against non target accounts as the real verdict. Cost per account engaged keeps the whole thing honest.
| Measure | When it reads | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| Account coverage | Early | What share of target accounts have a mapped, contactable set of the right stakeholders. If this is low, nothing downstream can work and most programmes never check it. |
| Engaged accounts | Early | Accounts showing meaningful engagement from more than one person. Single person engagement at a target account is interest, not a buying committee. |
| Meetings with named accounts | Middle | The first number sales will accept as real. Measured against the target list, not against total meetings. |
| Pipeline from target accounts | Middle | Qualified pipeline created inside the named list, as a share of all pipeline. The number that answers whether the programme is doing anything. |
| Win rate and deal size versus non target | Late | The actual argument for ABM. If targeted accounts do not close at a higher rate or a larger size, the extra cost per account was not earned. |
| Cost per account engaged | Throughout | Keeps the programme honest. One to one ABM is expensive per account and must be justified by contract value, not by enthusiasm. |
Start with coverage, because it is the measure most programmes skip and the one that most often explains failure. If you have the right contacts for 30 percent of your target accounts, the programme is structurally incapable of reaching the other 70 and no amount of creative work changes that. It is also cheap to fix once you know.
The fifth row is the one that decides whether to continue. ABM costs more per account than any other motion, so it has to produce either a higher win rate or larger deals to be worth running. If after a year targeted accounts close at the same rate and size as everything else, the honest conclusion is that the targeting was not real.
What is the difference between ABM and demand generation?
Demand generation creates interest across a market and finds out afterwards which companies responded. Account based marketing decides which companies matter first and concentrates spend on them. They are complementary, and most companies need demand generation working before ABM is worth starting.
The distinction is about where the targeting decision sits, not about the tactics, which overlap heavily. Both use content, search, advertising and email. The difference is whether the account list exists before the campaign or emerges from it.
| Demand generation | Account based marketing | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts from | A market and a message | A named list of companies |
| Measures | Leads, pipeline, cost per acquisition | Coverage, engaged accounts, pipeline inside the list |
| Works when | The market is large and the buyer is hard to name in advance | The buyer universe is finite and contract values are high |
| Fails when | Contract values cannot absorb broad spend | Sales will not commit to the list |
| Sales involvement | Downstream, after qualification | From the start, or the programme does not function |
The sequencing advice we give most often: get demand generation working first unless your market is genuinely small. A company that cannot generate interest at all will not fix that by concentrating the same ineffective message on two hundred named accounts, and ABM is considerably more expensive per account to run.
Where both run together, the useful arrangement is to let demand generation tell you which accounts to promote into the target list. An account that engaged on its own is better evidence than any intent signal you can buy, and it costs nothing extra to notice.
How do you judge an ABM agency?
Ask how they would build your account list and what would make them remove an account from it, ask what they need from your sales team in writing, and ask which measure they would report in month three. Vague answers to the second and third are the warning signs.
Four questions that separate programmes from packages.
How would you build the list, and what gets an account removed? A real answer involves your won and lost deals, a conversation with sellers, and explicit exclusion criteria. An answer that starts with a filtered export is describing outbound.
What do you need from our sales team? The honest answer is a named seller per account and an agreed cadence. An agency that says it needs nothing from sales is either very confident or planning to report on engagement metrics.
What will you report in month three? Coverage and engaged accounts are the right answer. Pipeline in month three is not credible in most B2B cycles, and an agency promising it is either going to count the wrong thing or has not thought about your sales cycle.
What happens if our CRM cannot tell you what an account is? This is the blocker we find most often, and the right answer is that it gets fixed first. The detail is on our CRM data quality page.
What does it cost to work with us?
We bill hourly against an agreed scope rather than a monthly retainer, so the research heavy opening months cost more than the steady state and you can see what the money bought. Signal pipelines and CRM work run at our senior rate.
A realistic first engagement is list definition, coverage repair and a tier two programme against one or two clusters, which usually lands between 60 and 120 hours depending on the state of the CRM. We will tell you inside the first few weeks if coverage is poor enough that the data work should come first.
Production
$24 to $45/ hour
Account research, cluster material, landing pages, sequences, campaign build and reporting.
Indicative until we have seen the CRM and the account list. Engagements start at ninety days with written outcomes, then month to month with thirty days notice.
When is ABM the wrong choice?
ABM is wrong below roughly 25,000 dollars of annual contract value, when sales has not agreed to the account list, when you cannot name the accounts that should buy, or when your CRM cannot reliably say what an account is. The last one is the most common and the least expected.
Your contract values are too small
ABM spends more per account than any other motion. Below roughly 25,000 dollars of annual contract value the arithmetic rarely closes, and a demand programme will produce more for the same money.
Sales has not agreed to the list
A target account list marketing wrote alone is a wish. If sellers will not work those accounts on an agreed cadence, you are buying engagement nobody will act on.
You cannot name the accounts
If the answer to which companies should buy this is anyone with more than fifty staff, you do not yet have the targeting ABM requires. That is a positioning problem to solve first.
Your CRM cannot tell you what an account is
Duplicate and fragmented account records make coverage, engagement and pipeline by account impossible to measure. This is the most common blocker we find and it is not a marketing fix.
If the third applies, the work to do first is positioning rather than campaigns. Being unable to name the companies that should buy is not a targeting problem, it is a sign that the offer is not yet specific enough, and our fractional CMO and marketing audit pages cover how we approach that.
If the constraint is prospecting capacity rather than targeting, the arithmetic on a sales development seat is worked through on the SDR and BDR page, including why most teams get more pipeline per pound from fixing their data than from adding people.
FAQ
Common questions
What does an ABM agency do?
An ABM agency helps you choose a defensible list of target accounts, find the real buying committee inside each one, build material for a specific situation rather than a generic persona, and run the programme jointly with sales. Measuring by account rather than by lead is usually the hardest part and the part most programmes skip.
What is the difference between ABM and outbound?
Outbound sends sequences to contacts and finds out afterwards which companies they came from. ABM decides which companies matter first and works backwards to the people inside them. Sending the same sequence to 500 contacts at 200 companies is outbound regardless of whether the contacts are grouped by employer.
How many accounts should be in an ABM programme?
Account count depends on the tier. One to one covers 10 to 30 accounts where a single win changes the year, one to few covers 30 to 150 clustered by a shared situation, and one to many covers 150 to 1,000 programmatically. Most companies should start at the middle tier, which produces a readable result on a sensible budget.
How should ABM be measured?
By account. Account coverage and engaged accounts read early, meetings and pipeline from the target list in the middle, and win rate and deal size against non target accounts as the real verdict. Start with coverage, because a programme with contacts for only 30 percent of its accounts cannot reach the rest whatever else it does.
Which buying signals actually work?
Funding rounds, relevant leadership hires, hiring patterns in the function you serve, public commitments with a deadline, and observable technology changes. The test is whether the signal answers why now in a sentence a stranger would accept. Intent data is the weakest of the set and works best for prioritising a list you already believe in.
Do we need an ABM platform?
Not to start, and buying one first is the most common expensive mistake in this category. Tools amplify a working motion rather than creating one, so a platform bought before the programme exists produces signals nobody is resourced to act on, an annual contract, and no change in pipeline.
When is ABM the wrong approach?
Below roughly 25,000 dollars of annual contract value, when sales has not agreed to work the account list on a cadence, when you cannot name the companies that should buy, or when the CRM cannot reliably identify an account. If you cannot name the accounts, the work to do first is positioning rather than campaigns.
How long before ABM produces pipeline?
Coverage and engagement read within the first two to three months, meetings follow, and pipeline is not a credible month three metric in most B2B sales cycles. An agency promising pipeline that early is either counting the wrong thing or has not considered how long your cycle actually runs.
What do you need from our sales team?
A named seller per target account and an agreed cadence for working them, in writing, before anything is built. ABM is a joint operating model before it is a marketing method, and a programme marketing runs alone produces engagement that nobody follows up on.
How do you build a target account list?
Start from closed won and closed lost deals rather than a filter. Find what the accounts you win share beyond size and industry, which is usually a situation rather than a firmographic, write explicit exclusion criteria, let sellers argue with the list, and size it to what can actually be worked at your intended cadence.
What is account coverage and why does it matter?
Coverage is the share of target accounts where you hold contactable people in each role that matters: who feels the problem, who evaluates, who signs, who can block. It is the measure that most often explains a failed programme, because an account with no mapped committee cannot be reached whatever else you do.
What content does an ABM programme need?
A page written to the cluster situation rather than a persona, something that answers why now, proof that still makes sense when forwarded to someone you never contacted, and a business case the economic buyer can defend without you in the room. The last one is rarely built and often decides the deal.
How do marketing and sales run ABM together?
A named seller per account rather than a team, a written cadence for what happens when an account engages, an account plan for tier one only, and a short weekly review about accounts rather than metrics. Ask a seller to name three target accounts and what they did this week: vagueness means the programme exists in marketing only.
What is the difference between ABM and demand generation?
Demand generation creates interest across a market and finds out afterwards which companies responded. ABM decides which companies matter first and concentrates spend on them. The tactics overlap heavily, so the real difference is whether the account list exists before the campaign or emerges from it. Get demand generation working first unless your market is genuinely small.
How do we judge an ABM agency?
Ask how they would build your list and what would get an account removed, what they need from sales in writing, what they would report in month three, and what they would do if your CRM cannot tell an account from a duplicate. Coverage and engaged accounts are the right month three answer.
Keep exploring
Related
- CRM data qualityThe blocker we find most often
- Free B2B data enrichmentBuilding the account list without credits
- SDR vs BDRWhat a prospecting seat costs per meeting
- B2B fractional CMOWhen you cannot name the accounts yet
- B2B SaaS marketingThe whole function, not one motion
- Manufacturing marketingNamed accounts in industrial markets
Let's talk
Tell us what you're building.
Get a free 30-minute strategy call. You'll leave with a clear plan, a realistic estimate and our honest opinion, whether or not you work with us.
- Email usmail@voliom.com